Invisible Voices

a voice for the voiceless

Kofa NWR – streaming video impacts

saguaro arizona csp

I became aware of issues on the Kofa National Wildlife Refuge when I got an alert from an Arizona group about the mountain lion hunting. Since then I’ve had the opportunity to discuss various Kofa issues with a retired wildlife biologist who spent a significant portion of his career at Kofa. He’s brought other issues to my attention, issues which should concern us both from an animal rights perspective as well as a biodiversity/environmental perspective.

I’ll post more about this, but for now I’m going to quote Ron’s letter that he requested I post, and strongly encourage that we all send emails to Kofa’s manager and others. This letter is in response to the US Fish & Wildlife’s news release on 2/9/2007 about the streaming video they are adding to a remote location in Kofa (with more to follow). This video is being presented as a way to allow the general public to observe the wildlife without disturbing them. A side effect, as Ron will point out, that is ignored in the USFWD’s news release is that this will give the hunters an easy way to make note of the habits of the animals they plan to kill. If hunting was disallowed in the refuges, the streaming video would indeed be a way to bring the public to the remote areas of the refuge with minimal impact to the wildlife. However, with hunting allowed, the video will have a large negative impact on the wildlife.

Good Afternoon,

The placement of these cameras will be in wilderness. I adamantly oppose the camera on Signal Peak , the highest point on the refuge at 4,877 feet. This remote, pristine area is the one of the last remaining prime bighorn lambing grounds on Kofa. I have stated for many years, and again recently in my opposition to the Kofa Mountain Lion Hunting Plan, that Signal Peak should be closed to human use, at least during the lambing season. I prefer to see the peak closed yearlong to human encroachment that causes detrimental disturbance to bighorn.

I also oppose the camera location at Adams Well unless there are severe restrictions, especially during hunting seasons, that would likely not make the project worthwhile anyway. Archery deer hunters set up hunting blinds around the well and drinker for the month of January. Having a streaming internet video do the hunter’s scouting of deer while they drink is highly unethical and certainly is not fair chase by most hunting standards. Bighorn also use this drinker and hunters will have an unfair advantage when hunting both ungulate species. I will send an e-mail letter in a few days with my reasoning why cameras should not be allowed at Adams Well and why they must not be allowed on Signal Peak for the public to view wildlife 24 hours a day, throughout the year.

I do not know if the Kofa NWR staff completed a Minimum Requirements Analysis(MRA)/Minimum Tool Analysis(MTA) for this project in wilderness. I am also unaware of the opportunity for public input regarding the cameras. The Kofa NWR staff did not post information of the streaming video project on the Kofa NWR website. I chanced on the information at the less-known FWS Virtual News Room.

If you oppose the placement of streaming video around a heavily used watering hole, where mule deer and bighorn hunting is also allowed, and a camera in remote sensitive lambing grounds, please send an e-mail expressing your concerns to, at least, the following U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service officials. Your reasons for not allowing the cameras may be different from mine and the diverse reasoning is valuable in decision-making.

Paul_cornes at fws dot gov — Kofa Refuge Manager/Region 2 Wilderness Coordinator

Thomas_harvey at fws dot gov — AZ/NM Refuge Supervisor (RM Cornes’ supervisor)

Nancy_roeper at fws dot gov — National Wilderness Coordinator

Retired Kofa NWR Wildlife Biologist
Former Federal Collateral Duty Refuge Law Enforcement Officer
Viet Nam Era Veteran

Ron tells me that he has emailed Cornes regarding the Minimum Requirements Analysis, and has not yet heard back. Recently an article showed up in the Yuma, Arizona paper (near where Kofa NWR is), which opens the floor for us to send letters to the editor, in addition to letters to Kofa’s manager.

2 responses to “Kofa NWR – streaming video impacts

  1. Ron March 1, 2007 at 8:29 pm

    The streaming video project has been withdrawn. The Refuge Manager conceded that they could not justify placing it in wilderness. The refuge staff received many phone calls and e-mails from not only wilderness advocates, but also hunters and hunting groups that were appalled with the aspect of video scouting and the resultant unethical negation of fair chase.

    This has been a good New Year for Kofa, first the cancellation of the proposed lion hunt and now this.

    Thanks to those people who were able to make comments or phone the Kofa Refuge Manager to stop this violation of wilderness. This is a good example that the government must listen to members of the public.

  2. Deb March 4, 2007 at 7:24 pm

    That is excellent news!

    I’ll encourage people to write to the Kof Refuge manager to thank him for this recent decision on the streaming video. Positive feedback can only help. Thanks Ron!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: